Wednesday’s Book Review: “Inventing Wyatt Earp: His Life and Many Legends”

large_170_bk1176-inventingwyattearp-300Inventing Wyatt Earp: His Life and Many Legends. By Allen Barra. New York: Carroll & Graff, Publishers, 1998, reprint edition, Castle Books, January 28, 2009.

For many years the standard work on the life of Wyatt Warp was the biography by Casey Tefertiller. I read that book several years ago and accepted most of what it had to say, then with further investigation—mostly by reading others’ research—I found that for all it’s usefulness Tefertiller’s account had some flaws. Some of that was just the problem of separating fact from legend, some of it was tall-tale repetition just for the sake of a good story. Others have tried to square the account of Eyatt Earp, especially his mythical gunfight at the OK corral.

Allen Barra’s Inventing Wyatt Earp: His Life and Many Legends does much to correct misconceptions and beat back mythology. It is not a biography by any stretch of the imagination. One will learn little of Earp’s  pre-Tombstone, Arizona, career, and not too much about his post gunfight experience. What you will find, however, is a first rate analysis of the gunfight, the nature of the feud with the Clanton clan, the nature of the “Cowboys” and their activities in southern Arizona, and the complex interrelationships of the Earps and other power centers in Tombstone.

What we find with Barra’s finely grained analysis is an assessment of a clear-eyed, even-handed, set of brothers who made their way to the far southwest to pursue the main chance. Barra’s discussion of Wyatt Earp peals back much of the veneer of a figure that has become a caricature of considerable debate and controversy. While Earp will remain a controversial figure into the foreseeable future, Barra’s work helps to draw out some key points about him and the Tombstone experience.

The Earp brothers—Wyatt, Morgan, Virgil, James, and Warren—found their way to Tombstone in 1879, proceeded to develop businesses, and tried to get rich in a mining boom town. Their investments in several mining claims and water rights brought them into conflict with Frank and Tom McLaury and Billy and Ike Clanton, Johnny Ringo, Curly Bill Brocius, and a few others. A few drunken brawls only raised the level of the feud. Doc Holliday, a friend of Wyatt Earp, also came to Tombstone and with his arrival the principal actors in the gunfight were present.

Barra makes much of the fact that despite this rivalry, it wasn’t really a blood feud, at least not at first. There had been a succession of altercations between these two groups for months, but Wyatt Earp was gambling with some of those on the other side of the gunfight only a few days beforehand. Moreover, the gunfight was really about a weapons violation in Tombstone. In April 1881, the Tombstone city council passed an ordinance prohibiting anyone from carrying firearms in the city limits. Anyone entering town was required to leave their weapons at any livery or saloon where they could pick them up when they left town. This was an interesting ordinance that the Second Amendment defenders would probably not appreciate, but it was because the Clantons, McLaurys, and others failed to do so that the Earps and Holliday confronted them, demanding that they give up their weapons. This was what caused the shoot out.

The gunfight, taking place on October 26, 1881, probably lasted only about 30 seconds and those analyzing it have concluded that only about 30 shots were fired. It was a close-range affair, with Vrgil, Wyatt, Morgan, and Holliday armed with shotguns on one side and Billy Claiborne, Ike and Billy Clanton, and Tom and Frank McLaury on the other. Billy Clanton and both McLaurys were killed, while Virgil and Morgan Earp were wounded.

The Earps were brought before a judge and exonerated, but this led to an escalation of violence thereafter. Virgil Earp was ambushed in Tombstone on the night of December 28, 1881, and was hit by three loads of double-barreled buckshot. He survived but lost an arm. The next March Morgan was murdered. Wyatt Earp went on a rampage to avenge this action, exactly what had happened after the OK Corral gunfight when friends and relatives of Billy Clanton and the McLaury’s had done. These revenge killings ended in the deaths of three other men thought to be responsible for the attacks on the Earps. The next month Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday left Arizona Territory, in April 1882, and traveled to Colorado.

Overall, Inventing Wyatt Earp is a creditable analysis of a well-known, but poorly understood, story. Allen Barra’s book is well-researched and written, convincing, and entertaining. Most are aware of Wyatt Earp but probably know more about the mythical figure than the actual man. One caution, and this is not a major problem regardless of how irritating it was, this book is so poorly edited that it really distracted from the reading experience. It was riddled with typos and poor grammar, misspellings, and the like.

This entry was posted in History and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Wednesday’s Book Review: “Inventing Wyatt Earp: His Life and Many Legends”

  1. Lee Branch says:

    A vis the Earp bio revies: I found it interesting to read in a bio of Margaret Mitchell, that the character of ‘Aunt Pittypat’~ one of the minor characters in ‘GTWW’ was based on Mitchells ‘Great Aunt’. As a young woman the love of her life left her for the dryer climate of the SW territories where he hoped to bring his tubercolisis into remission. He never returned for her~ and the forlorn young Miss took vows and became a teacher in a holy order. The young man who felt their love hopeless as long as he was incurably ill? John ‘Doc’ Holliday!

    I know of your baseball interest, and join you in welcoming another Spring Training Season with all the anticipation it brings~

    Lee Branch


  2. Sam Gregson says:

    Dear Roger-

    Really enjoying the blog! Please keep up the good work.

    I was wondering if you could help me (although I hate to ask!). I am a physicist at Cambridge University in the UK and the Large Hadron Collider. I am writing a TEDx talk regarding how science communication to the public can be improved. Part of the talk centres around empowering the audience by letting them know that their opinions and support can affect real change in scientific policy at the political level. I do not think this is currently very true (as science policy doesnt seem high on the political agenda), but I think it was during the US “space race” years. I was told you wrote a piece and had a lot of statistics about public support for the space race and how that fed into continued technological development. I was wondering whether you could point me to those articles, facts and figures? If you could, I’d be extremely grateful!

    Exciting the public about science and having them bring the government to task on scientific issues is a sure fire route to advancement!

    All the best,

    Sam 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s