In April 2012 I wrote an op-ed for Space News on “The NACA Model for Technology Transfer.” I also emphasized it on this blog last year as well. Check that out here. I Am re-directing readers to it now because I keep seeing comments from various people, as well as in the media, that the future of NASA should be more oriented toward aerospace research as was the case with the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), NASA’s Immediate predecessor. The real question is, what does that mean; everyone seemingly has their own definition and there is little overlap between meanings from one person to another. I tried to lay out in this article what it meant for the NACA; if that is truly the consensus of what the future direction of NASA should be so be it. But I don’t see a consensus in the debate on this issue at present. Regardless, I offer this as a statement of the NACA model for technology transfer.
- Very cool. twitter.com/NedSparks/stat… 14 hours ago
- Robert M. Utley: Founder of the National Historic Preservation Program shar.es/1q9enL via @ncph. The story of a pioneering program. 14 hours ago
- Very cool job possibility. twitter.com/ali_boyle/stat… 14 hours ago
- This could be fun. A Comfortable Sweatsuit Modeled After the NASA Apollo 11 Spacesuit laughingsquid.com/a-comfortable-… via @LaughingSquid 14 hours ago
- Yes, it's true! Historian have known about Joseph Smith's sexual shenanigans in the 1840s for a long time. authorgrantpalmer.weebly.com/sexual-allegat… 15 hours ago