In April 2012 I wrote an op-ed for Space News on “The NACA Model for Technology Transfer.” I also emphasized it on this blog last year as well. Check that out here. I Am re-directing readers to it now because I keep seeing comments from various people, as well as in the media, that the future of NASA should be more oriented toward aerospace research as was the case with the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), NASA’s Immediate predecessor. The real question is, what does that mean; everyone seemingly has their own definition and there is little overlap between meanings from one person to another. I tried to lay out in this article what it meant for the NACA; if that is truly the consensus of what the future direction of NASA should be so be it. But I don’t see a consensus in the debate on this issue at present. Regardless, I offer this as a statement of the NACA model for technology transfer.
- Wednesday’s Book Review: “Race and Reunion” launiusr.wordpress.com/2015/09/02/wed… http://t.co/CWpKSVm9Y1 fb.me/2siH4D4C9 1 day ago
- Wednesday’s Book Review: “Race and Reunion” launiusr.wordpress.com/2015/09/02/wed… http://t.co/CWpKSVm9Y1 1 day ago
- Announcing the Space Policy and History Forum #17, September 14, 2015 launiusr.wordpress.com/2015/08/31/ann… http://t.co/AZp2Kl0teJ fb.me/2Evto1oJM 3 days ago
- Announcing the Space Policy and History Forum #17, September 14,@2015 launiusr.wordpress.com/2015/08/31/ann… http://t.co/AZp2Kl0teJ 3 days ago
- Retweeted Phil Plait (@BadAstronomer): When stars die, they make giant flaming screaming skulls. Sometimes.... fb.me/8dM75xFou 5 days ago