Wednesday’s Book Review: “Near-Earth Objects: Finding Them Before They Find Us”


New Earth ObjectsNear-Earth Objects: Finding Them Before They Find Us. By Donald H. Yeomans. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012. Hardcover with dust jacket. ISBN: 978-0-691-14929-5. 200 pages. 20 half tones. 19 line illus. 6 tables. 6 x 9 in. $24.94 USD.

The premise of this book by Jet Propulsion Laboratory scientist Donald H. Yeomans is that of all of the threats to life on this planet, perhaps the most significant is a mass extinction coming from either a comet or asteroid impact. This seems all the more real because of the Chelyabinsk, Russia, event on February 15, 2013. In Near-Earth Objects: Finding Them Before They Find Us Yeomans offers a general audience an introduction to the science of near-Earth objects—especially the history, applications, and ongoing quest to find these celestial objects before they hit Earth.

I was introduced to this reality twenty years ago at the annual meeting of this professional society when a noted scientist gave a presentation entitled “Chicken Little Was Right.” He claimed that humans had a greater chance of being killed by a comet or asteroid falling from the sky than dying in an airplane crash. This is true, especially as one projects the risk over a very long period of time. Mathematical calculations confirm that every person alive today faces 1 chance in 5,000 that he or she will be killed by some type of extraterrestrial impact during his or her lifetime since several thousand meteorites, comets, and asteroids cross Earth’s orbit, and many small pieces enter the atmosphere every day. One need only look at the craters on the Moon, and such wonders as Meteor Crater in Arizona, to verify the fact that solar system bodies make fine targets for comets and asteroids. More than ever before, as Yeomans’s makes clear, throughout history asteroids and comets have struck Earth with destructive consequences.

The reality of a massive threat to life on Earth from space entered the public consciousness in 1980 when scientists—especially Luis and Walter Alvarez—proposed a hypothesis that dinosaurs became extinct after an asteroid or comet only six to nine miles wide left a crater 186 miles wide in Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula and through enough dust into the atmosphere to cause global climate change. This “K-T extinction”—occurring at the boundary between the Cretaceous period (K) and the Tertiary period (T)—has become common knowledge as the reason for the dinosaur mass extinction and it has engendered all manner of responses in popular culture. Notably, two blockbuster films in 1998—Armageddon and Deep Impact—used a potential asteroid impact as the premise for space adventures to avert a mass extinction. Additionally, some entrepreneurs have developed and sold asteroid survival kits consisting of a hard hat and surgical mask; a measure of the fact that everything in modern society is considered a commodity from which to turn a profit.

In this work Yeomans presents a compelling account of the origins of the solar system, taking notice of all of the ingredients orbiting the Sun including those smaller bodies that are attracted to larger gravitational fields and slam into them on a regular basis. Of course, comets and meteors have evolved over time and some still crash into bodies in the solar system, notably Shoemaker-Levy 9 that hit Jupiter in 1994 with spectacular results.

Some of these objects journey near Earth, and these “near-Earth objects” represent a threat that could destroy all life on this planet. Yeomans lays out this story, commenting on the many known and possible impacts in history. He makes much of the destruction wrought by the famous Tunguska event in 1908 near what is now Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia, resulting from an air burst of a large meteoroid or comet only about 300 feet in diameter. By inference, something a few miles in diameter could bring about mass extinction. This prompts Yeomans to discuss how we might be able to reduce this threat with a survey to catalog and track these objects.

Understanding the reality of the impact threat that could destroy all life on this planet is a critical component of future efforts to mitigate it. Efforts to catalogue all Earth-crossing asteroids, track their trajectories, and develop countermeasures to destroy or deflect objects on a collision course with Earth are important, but to ensure the survival of the species humanity must ultimately build outposts elsewhere. Astronaut John Young said it best in the November-December 2003 issue of Space Times: to paraphrase Pogo, “I have met an endangered species, and it is us.” While Yeomans does not go quite this far with his discussion, it is one response to the concern.

Yeomans’s book offers a strong introduction to the subject of near-Earth objects. In addition to the threat posed by these objects, the author advocates for their study for purely scientific purposes. “In terms of their chemical composition and thermal history, many of them are among the least changed members of our solar system” (p. 56). This could help scientists understand the evolution of the cosmos. Yeomans urges an aggressive exploration program to understand these small bodies, rogue or not. Thus far it is a modest program; perhaps it will grow in the future.

This entry was posted in History, Science, Space and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Wednesday’s Book Review: “Near-Earth Objects: Finding Them Before They Find Us”

  1. The “threat” is vastly overblown. We have no evidence of human deaths conclusively attributable to impacts in all human history. Most large impacts – for example, Chesapeake – were not accompanied by mass extinctions. Small impacts – Meteor Crater – produce local effects; these might be compared to 1980 Mt. St. Helens eruption. The scientific justification is the important one. Asteroids are fascinating robotic exploration targets. Scare-mongering is not a good thing.

    Like

  2. Erik Conway says:

    “These “near-Earth objects” represent a threat that could destroy all life on this planet.” Really, Roger? I think that if the K-T asteroid couldn’t accomplish the extinction of all life, then the possibility is vanishingly remote. The K-T Krunch eliminated all the large-bodied critters from land, and imposed a die-off on smaller species. But the smaller species repopulated, obviously. You’d need an impactor the size of Mars to have a chance of actually eliminating the insects and bacteria and plankton. And we’d have seen that one by now.

    “End of current civilization” is much more likely, but that can be accomplished without asteroid bombardment–our nuclear weapons arsenal is capable of it, and it will end when the fossil fuels run out in any case. Industrial agriculture can’t be maintained without the petrochemical-derived fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides we lavish our crops, and poison our waters, with. And without industrial ag, there’s no way to maintain our current population.

    There’s a difference between “might” and “will.” Our fossil civilization has a couple of centuries left at most; a civilization-ending asteroid isn’t likely in such a short time-frame. And flight to some other planet isn’t likely to save us from civilization collapse, as there are no other ecosystems “out there” to flee to, and we have no idea how to create, from scratch, a functioning, stable ecosystem. All of our attempts to date have failed.

    I’d prefer policymakers focusing their efforts on that which will happen before addressing that which might happen.

    Like

    • launiusr says:

      Erik, thanks for these comments. I appreciate your note of skepticism in taking at face value all the people running around with their hair on fire. Good points all.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s