In April 2012 I wrote an op-ed for Space News on “The NACA Model for Technology Transfer.” I also emphasized it on this blog last year as well. Check that out here. I Am re-directing readers to it now because I keep seeing comments from various people, as well as in the media, that the future of NASA should be more oriented toward aerospace research as was the case with the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), NASA’s Immediate predecessor. The real question is, what does that mean; everyone seemingly has their own definition and there is little overlap between meanings from one person to another. I tried to lay out in this article what it meant for the NACA; if that is truly the consensus of what the future direction of NASA should be so be it. But I don’t see a consensus in the debate on this issue at present. Regardless, I offer this as a statement of the NACA model for technology transfer.
- RT @UMD_CODER: @airandspace Assoc. Dir. for Collections & Curatorial Affairs @Launiusr to speak at our Nov 18-20 Workshop! Register http://… 6 hours ago
- I short CNN piece on the Antares accident: cnn.com/video/data/2.0…. I was interviewed for it. 7 hours ago
- The Historical Roots of the Ebola Scare in the United States historynewsnetwork.org/article/157382 via @sharethis 1 day ago
- RT @JamesFallows: Cessna realtime video of Antares explosion youtube.com/watch?v=zarWT7… dramatic in itself and an idea of how world looks from… 1 day ago
- RT @LaunchComplex: When Congress inevitably criticizes Orbital for using Russian engines, let's turn it back on them for not funding creati… 1 day ago